- News & Analysis
- Strategies & Tactics
For the first time in a decade, Boeing in 2012 outperformed its only real rival, Airbus, both selling and delivering more planes.
That performance was based in part on sales of its newest widebody jet, the 787 Dreamliner.
The first 787 was received by ANA in September 2011, and since then about 35 787s have been delivered to eight airline customers.
As of last month, the company had taken orders for 844 Dreamliners, with more expected in 2013.
But the new planes have come in for unwanted scrutiny after safety concerns were raised by a series of electro-mechanical incidents, most recently today’s fire on a Japan Airlines 787 as it sat parked at a gate at Boston’s Logan Airport.
Passengers and crew had already deplaned after the flight arrived from Tokyo, and the fire was extinguished with no injuries or significant damage to the aircraft. But it was just the latest in a series of mishaps that have bedeviled the plane’s early days in service.
As has been pointed out by a number of aviation experts, such problems with a new aircraft — especially one that uses novel materials and production techniques, as the 787 does — are not uncommon. Indeed, as with a newly launched computer operating system, it is to be expected that problems will be identified and addressed during the plane’s initial in-service period. Testing doesn’t end with the first delivery.
Should the average flyer find comfort in such anodyne assurances?
I do. I’d happily fly on a Dreamliner tomorrow if the opportunity arose to do so.
But if you believe that where there’s smoke, there’s likely to be fire, you might want to defer your first 787 flight. The longer you wait, the higher the likelihood that all the Dreamliner’s gremlins will have been exorcised.
Reader Reality Check
Are the 787’s problems of concern to you? Would you fly on one anyway?
Other Posts of Interest
Stay in Touch